Either through bank-based or through Fintech-based solutions, it enables trade finance “assets” (financial documents such as Bills of Lading, Bills of Exchange or Promissory Notes) to be made available or “distributed” across banks, institutional investors or non-bank trade finance providers (such as invoice finance or supply chain finance providers). This increases the amount of available finance for SMEs. This advantage comes simply from the fact that the documents themselves are instruments through which finance can be enabled. Making them digital means that they go to a wider potential market in a secure way.
Digital documentation simply speeds up the processing time. If everything is manual, then estimates by the ICC, and highlighted above, suggest that it can take more than four weeks to process the documentation before awarding finance to a particular transaction or project. This is a burden for the SME and for the trade finance provider.
The main sources of fraud in current systems is multiple uses of one document for financing purposes, the lack of transparency in the trade system, which means that documents can potentially be used for financial or insurance purposes that are not genuine or not the original, and the misallocation of product codes to avoid taxation or identification as a dual-use good. This risk is likely to become greater as we move towards requirements for greater transparency on environment, social and governance (ESG) grounds.
There are currently no common standards in global trade outside of Customs and Excise frameworks, dual-use goods and prohibited trade, and increasingly sustainable financial disclosures (SFD). The process of digitisation has not only the capacity to accelerate the process of standardisation in global trade but is also a pre-requisite of the digitisation process itself in order to avoid further complexity.
Reducing Pre-Border and Border Costs for Commonwealth Countries
Many Commonwealth countries face very high costs of exporting due to several factors that moving to paperless trade can help alleviate. The non- standardised and manual nature of a Bill of Lading makes border processes complex and costly for the exporter.
Lower levels of education or literacy mean that reams of manual documentation in customs and excise forms, identification requirements, rules of origin and Incoterms compliance present a major challenge for some groups.
A Difficult Post-Pandemic Recovery
Many Commonwealth countries, irrespective of their state of development, are likely to struggle to recover quickly from the Covid-19 pandemic. Trade across the whole of the Commonwealth is likely to grow in 2026 by just 0.2 per cent annually over the next 5 years, which is modest, but of the 20 countries with the slowest growth projections for 2026, only seven are not SIDS and six of these are emerging African economies.
Prohibitive Trade Costs as a Share of Trade Revenues
Trade costs are currently prohibitive for many countries across the Commonwealth. For four Commonwealth economies, costs are higher than 100 per cent of the revenues received from trade, while another 34 economies are burdened with costs that exceed 50 per cent of the revenues they receive from trade. These are considering just costs associated with border crossing and transport – adding raw materials, production, sales and distribution costs would potentially mean more Commonwealth countries would find the costs of exporting prohibitive.
Border and transportation costs are the easiest to address through Single Windows and electronic transferable records, suggesting that there would be real advantages from implementing the legal reforms to enable this as soon as possible.
Benefits Of Adopting Electronic Transferable Records
It is not the most developed Commonwealth economies, such as the UK, Australia, New Zealand or Canada, who would feel the biggest benefits reduction in costs in trade terms. In these countries, production is at the higher end of the value and supply chain and so trade is less cost elastic meaning that at a country level, the total effect is smaller. Rather, it is in the market creation and enabling impact in Commonwealth LDCs and SIDS where the impact would be most felt.
Impact on Commonwealth Trade
The research set out to estimate the impact on Commonwealth trade of adopting electronic transferable records. The estimates are derived from qualitative assessments and represent a target from potential market creation, the inclusion of more diverse exporters, and the elimination or significant reduction in some of the non-trade barriers to trade.
For all Commonwealth economies, there will be a significant improvement in trade resulting from two factors:
- Reduction in trade costs, which enables more exporters to access trade routes;
- Improvement in access to finance, which has the effect of creating markets, especially for MSMEs who are currently excluded because they are unable to access traditional forms of trade finance because of due diligence costs involved.
By combining the impact of cost reductions and greater access to finance, there could be as much as a US$1.1 trillion increase in trade by 2026, assuming the upper bound of estimates by 2026.